A sort of "Promiscuity Index" so to speak...
(RLA -216) / RLP
-------------------- = PI
(SLA x 5) / SLP
where:
RLA = your RL age in months
RLP = the number of RL sex partners since your 18th Bday
SLA = your SL age in months
SLP = the number of SL sex partners since rezz-day
PI = Promiscuity Index (I wonder is someone is going to turn up with 3.14 *grins*)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a80ce/a80cee1b725e952ccf7672380bc62a58c9f3c49f" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da7ad/da7aded2c258b1a310c8b9e326553fd60780d3bc" alt=""
What do we get out of this? I think it makes for a nice comparison of your promiscuity in SL as opposed to RL. Let's look at an of course completely fictional example:
A male 42 years old has had 15 sex partners since he was 18. In SL he has had 5 since he rezzed 19 months ago.
That makes:
(506 - 216) /15
------------------- = 1,02
(19 x 5) / 5
The conclusion in this case would be that his promiscuity in SL and RL are fairly the same.
index > 1 = RL promiscuity < SL promiscuity
index < 1 = SL promiscuity < RL promiscuity
This says nothing about the frequency of SLex or RLex. I guess if you would like to hazard a guess at how often you've done it in RL since you turned 18 and the number of times you engaged in SLex in SL you could replace RLP and SLP by those values but I'm not going to venture there :-)
On a side note, this equation also solves the problem Vint had with her calculation that could lead to an illegal "divide by 0".
I'm as always curious to hear your thoughts and reactions!
And your Indexes of course ;-)
PS In case you were wondering, no, it's not me in the top picture ...
8 comments:
MMMMMmmmm.... I am so NOT going to try to quantify the frequency so, using the original formula
PI = 1.07
So..... fairly evenly promiscuous or fairly evenly prudish???
I'm not telling... *EG*
Héhé. Two questions though.
Why start at age 18 for the 'humans'?
Any chance you saw Pi lately? ;)
2.7... wtf? am/was I misbehaving in SL, or to prudish in RL...?? :-)
@veronique It's never to late to up your RLP ;-)
I guess I found a gap in your musings *G* According to your calculation I have to be the SL slut of the block and the RL female pope *G*
(348-216) / 1
-------------- = 11,31
(7*5) / 3
Yet I think the formula has 2 weak points:
1. Like several of the readers (at least I guess so) I started out earlier then 18.
2. The kink factor. Even though I committed myself very early in my life I do things that would drive the red into the faces of some people (SL and RL). Shouldn´t we take that into consideration?
Ok back to the books professor Loki. Still lots of work to do *G*
Well Tenchi I think you are right. 16 would be a more appropriate RL starting age. As for the kink factor; in a way the PI represents the kink factor :-)
but only in a very remote way. comparing someone who became sexually active with 16 to someone who has a foot worthshipping fetish for example doesn´t go in the right direction i think since it is to pairs of boots ;)
8.8 lol!
and the calculation suits me fine, having been a late bloomer.
-Silver
Post a Comment